Like many people who become interested in spirituality, consciousness and the nature of reality, I spent years exploring different teachings, traditions and people who seemed to have answers I didn't.
Some of what I found was genuinely valuable. Some of it changed the way I saw the world. But eventually, I became more interested in a different question:
"What would happen if I stopped taking everyone else's word for it?"
That question changed the way I approached almost everything. I started questioning the ideas I had accepted, the assumptions underneath them and, eventually, the questions themselves. Rather than continually looking for someone who could tell me what was true, I became interested in testing my own wisdom and learning to distinguish between what I actually knew, what I believed, what I had been told and what I simply hadn't figured out yet. That meant testing my own wisdom rather than simply collecting other people's.
And that's also when I saw that even the Red Pill was a trap.
Because replacing one explanation with another doesn't necessarily mean you've started thinking for yourself. You can leave one belief system and walk straight into another, convinced you've finally found the truth.
That became an important part of how I approach my work.
I don't believe you need another person to tell you what your experience means. I can offer perspectives, questions, frameworks and ways of looking that you may not have considered. I can challenge an assumption or help you see something you may have been too close to see. But I don't want my interpretation to become another authority you depend on.
I'm particularly interested in what happens when we stop automatically accepting the first explanation that appears. That curiosity has taken my work across consciousness, spirituality, philosophy, the nature of reality, information and the relationship between what we experience and what may be underlying it.
That exploration eventually led me into Information Field work and TimeWaver Pro, which opened another way of exploring the relationship between consciousness, information and the physical world.
I don't see these areas as separate boxes. They are different ways of looking at questions that have interested human beings for a very long time:
What are we?
What is consciousness?
Why do we experience the world as we do?
What influences our experience?
And how much of what we call reality is actually being noticed by us?
I don't have a perfect answer for reality. Frankly, anyone who does deserves a follow-up question. What I do have is a continuing willingness to investigate, challenge my own assumptions and change my mind when something gives me reason to.